Every Assertion, and What Backs It
This site tries not to say anything it cannot source. The ledger lists each significant assertion made across the site, its evidence class, the source behind it, and — where the evidence has limits — what those limits are.
Registered claims
The LaGrange project was publicly announced with a commitment of approximately 856 jobs over five years.
| Evidence | Press releases issued November 8, 2021 by the Office of Governor Brian P. Kemp and by RemArms, LLC, reproduced as Exhibits A and B to the Verified Complaint. [S2] [S3] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | This records what was publicly stated in 2021. It is not a statement about what was subsequently achieved. |
| Entities | RemArms, LLC, Ken D’Arcy |
Production at the Remington plant in Ilion, New York ceased in early 2024, after approximately 208 years of operation at that site.
| Evidence | Public reporting; referenced at Verified Complaint ¶¶26, 32. [S1] |
|---|---|
| Entities | RemArms, LLC |
Mechanics’ liens were recorded against the LaGrange facility in the Troup County lien records by Southeastern Site Development, Inc., Accuwright Mechanical, and Reinicke Athens, Inc.
| Evidence | Lien Book 184, p. 288; Lien Book 185, p. 98; Lien Book 185, p. 124; Lien Book 185, pp. 514–517. Verifiable by book and page at the Clerk of Superior Court, Troup County. [S5] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | That a lien was recorded is a fact of record. A recorded lien evidences the filer’s claim of non-payment; it is not an adjudication that a debt is owed. |
| Entities | Southeastern Site Development, Inc., Accuwright Mechanical, Reinicke Athens, Inc. |
Construction-loan security instruments encumbering the LaGrange facility were recorded in Troup County on October 7, 2024.
| Evidence | Leasehold Deed to Secure Debt, Deed Book 2290, p. 278; Assignment of Rents, Deed Book 2290, p. 323. [S4] |
|---|
A civil action was filed on May 6, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Christopher Ripley, Mulford Waldrop, Frank D. Foley III, and Jack Foley, docketed as No. 1:26-cv-00529-MN.
| Evidence | D. Del. docket; the filing is also described at Verified Complaint ¶74. [S7] [S1] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | That the action was filed is a fact of record. The contents of the complaint are the plaintiffs’ allegations. |
| Entities | Roundhill Group LLC, Christopher B. Ripley |
| Case | 1:26-cv-00529-MN |
The plaintiffs in the Delaware action requested a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.
| Evidence | D. Del. docket, No. 1:26-cv-00529-MN. Underlying document not yet obtained by this repository. [S7] |
|---|---|
| Entities | Roundhill Group LLC |
| Case | 1:26-cv-00529-MN |
The requested temporary restraining order in the Delaware action was denied on May 7, 2026.
| Evidence | D. Del. docket, No. 1:26-cv-00529-MN. Underlying order not yet obtained by this repository. [S7] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | A denial of a temporary restraining order resolves the application for emergency relief only. It is not a ruling on the merits of any claim, it does not resolve the case, and it is not a determination that either side will prevail. |
| Case | 1:26-cv-00529-MN |
On June 18, 2026, Christopher Ripley filed an answer and counterclaims in the Delaware action.
| Evidence | D. Del. docket, No. 1:26-cv-00529-MN. Underlying document not yet obtained by this repository. [S7] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | That the pleading was filed is a fact of record. The denials and counterclaims it contains are the filing party’s assertions, which the counter-defendants are entitled to contest. |
| Entities | Christopher B. Ripley |
| Case | 1:26-cv-00529-MN |
An amended complaint was filed in the Delaware action on June 26, 2026, and on June 29, 2026 pending motions to dismiss were denied as moot.
| Evidence | D. Del. docket, No. 1:26-cv-00529-MN. Underlying documents not yet obtained by this repository. [S7] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | A denial as moot is a procedural consequence of a superseding pleading. It is not a ruling that the motions lacked merit. |
| Case | 1:26-cv-00529-MN |
A 65-page Verified Complaint asserting eleven counts and demanding a jury trial was filed on June 29, 2026 in the Superior Court of Troup County, Georgia, docketed as No. 26-CV-0369.
| Evidence | The full document is published in this repository. Accepted by the Clerk at 10:29 a.m. [S1] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | That the complaint was filed is a fact of record. Every substantive statement within it is an allegation by the plaintiffs, which the defendants are entitled to contest. |
| Entities | Christopher B. Ripley, Rip95 LLC d/b/a Risk Off Capital, LLC, Scott Soura |
| Case | 26-CV-0369 |
The Verified Complaint alleges that internal operating plans projected a LaGrange workforce below 200, and that this was inconsistent with the publicly announced 856-job commitment.
| Evidence | Verified Complaint ¶¶28–30. [S1] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | This is an allegation in a pleading. No court has determined whether it is true. |
| Entities | Scott Soura, Ken D’Arcy |
| Case | 26-CV-0369 |
The Verified Complaint alleges that a construction-loan draw designated for identified contractors was diverted away from those contractors upon receipt.
| Evidence | Verified Complaint ¶¶50–51. [S1] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | This is an allegation in a pleading. No court has determined whether it is true, and the defendants are entitled to contest it. |
| Case | 26-CV-0369 |
The Verified Complaint alleges that the enterprise’s unpaid-creditor list exceeds 250 businesses and tradespeople.
| Evidence | Verified Complaint ¶33. [S1] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | This is an allegation in a pleading. This site has not independently enumerated the creditor list, and the figure has not been adjudicated. |
| Case | 26-CV-0369 |
No court has issued a ruling on the merits of any claim in either the Delaware or the Georgia action.
| Evidence | Based on the docket events tracked by this site as of the date shown. This is this site’s characterization of the procedural posture, not a statement by any court. [S1] [S7] |
|---|---|
| Caveat | This site does not hold complete dockets for either action. Confirm current posture against the courts’ own records before relying on this. |
| Case | 1:26-cv-00529-MN, 26-CV-0369 |
Found an Error?
Every entry here is meant to be checkable against its source. If one is wrong, this site wants to know and will correct it.
Corrections & Standards